Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Payment of Secondary and Higher Education Cess under wrong account code

SPIC Ltd.
The Secondary and Higher Education cess (SHE CESS) has been introduced during the Budget 2007. When it was introduced, the accounting codes were not alloted and hence the SHE CESS was remitted mentioning 'Yet to be alloted' in the TR 6 Challan. The dept stated that the cess has been remitted under wrong accounting code and demanded the duty once again. The assessee argued by taking legal shelter under ST Circular 58/7/2003 dt. 20.05.03 and F. No. Coord/13-6/Head of A/c/06-07/Vol-VI/317 dt. 30.03.07. I need to know whether any judgment was pronounced on this subject matter by any appellate authorities in order to defend the case strongly.
SPIC Ltd. Challenges Demand for Repayment of SHE Cess Due to Initial Payment Under Incorrect Code; Cites 2008 Decision SPIC Ltd. raised a query regarding the payment of the Secondary and Higher Education Cess (SHE CESS) under an incorrect account code due to the absence of designated codes when the cess was introduced in the 2007 budget. The department demanded repayment, claiming the initial payment was under the wrong code. SPIC Ltd. cited specific legal circulars to defend their position and sought judgments from appellate authorities to support their case. A respondent, Surender Gupta, advised that repayment was unnecessary, referencing a 2008 decision by the CESTAT, Ahmedabad. SPIC Ltd. expressed gratitude for the guidance. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues