Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

section 14A

satbir singhwahi

proprietorship firm has 900 lac capital and has invested in partnership firms 450 lacs and has raised unsecured loans of 200 lacs. The interest paid on unsecured loans is claimed as expenditure against trading profit on sale/purchase of land.The investment in partnership firms of 450 lacs , the profit share is claimed as exempt. The A.O. is insisting to disallow interest on unsecured loans u/s 14A.Is he correct when sufficient capital is there.

Disallowance of expenditure for exempt income under section 14A applied where investments are funded by borrowed money. The AO proposes disallowing interest under section 14A as attributable to exempt income from partnership profit. One respondent supports disallowance per precedent; another argues no disallowance if investments were from capital and that a partner's profit share is not exempt in the aggregate tax context; a third respondent rejects that view, treating the partner's profit as excluded income and concluding that use of borrowed funds to make the investment would invoke section 14A, subject to different treatment where the partner receives interest on the investment. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Mukesh Kumar on Sep 7, 2010
From the face of the query, it appears that the AO is correct in insisting disallowing interest towards income which is not forming part of total income. There are various case laws under section 14A pertaining to dis allowance of expenditure towards exempted income. 
DEV KUMAR KOTHARI on Sep 7, 2010

In case there is evidence of investment in firm out of capital an no use of borowed funds, then any interest cannot be disallowed as incurred in relation to exempt income.

Furthermore, share in profit is received and treated as exempt only because the firm has already paid tax on it. Make comparison with salary and interest received which is taxable in hands of partner because firm has not paid tax on it. The share in profit is exempt, only because the firm has paid tax. Therefore, the share in profit is not an income which is exempt in overall context of IT Act.

Therefore, Section 14A is not at all applicable. 

CAGOPALJI AGRAWAL on Sep 7, 2010

With utmost regards to Kothari Ji, I differ with the second para of the opinion as to my view if borrowed funds have been invested in firm then provisions of section 14A would apply as the share in firm does not take part of total income of the assessee by virtue of section 10(2A). Taking the similar case of dividend which is exempt but already suffer the DDT hence the analogy that the share of partner is already taxed, could not apply.

Of course, if the partner is getting interest on this investment then the position may differ.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues