Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

PAC - Difference in Sub Contractor / Vendor

Sanjit Satyanath
Under Project Authority Certificate, the main contractor (X) has placed an order of Y. Y inturn places the order on Z ( That's me a first stage dealer). We turn place the order on Manufacturer (A) from where materail will be directly shipped out to Y. In the PAC received from X, Both 'Y' & 'A' is mentioned in the Annexure I as the Sub Vendor. Please advice if this is correct or a seperate letter is required from X that 'A' is the vendor of 'Y'
Deemed export: naming both subcontractor and manufacturer in a project authority certificate suffices to secure the benefit. Inclusion of both the intermediary vendor/subcontractor and the manufacturer as named vendors in the Project Authority Certificate annexure is sufficient for claiming the deemed export benefit; a separate letter from the main contractor is not required where both entities are expressly listed. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Surender Gupta on Aug 11, 2010
if both the vendors, are mentioned in PAC, it should be sufficient for the purpose of benefit of deemed export.
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues