Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

service tax on rent (lease rent)

ASHOK VIJAY

We had given commercial properties on lease.The tenant are not paying service tax refering the decision of Delhi High Court. Please let me know what about Service tax deposit liability on our part. How the rent received on such commercial properties to be shown in Return ST-3  Early reply will be awaited Ashok Vijay

Amendments in Finance Bill 2010 classify property rent as a taxable service; tenants divided over service tax payment. A user inquired about the service tax liability on commercial property leases, noting tenants' refusal to pay based on a Delhi High Court decision. A respondent clarified that the Finance Bill 2010 amendments now classify renting as a taxable service, although its retrospective application could be contentious. Another respondent highlighted that tenants eligible for CENVAT are willing to pay the service tax, while others are not. They suggested that the owners' association should lobby for a reverse charge mechanism, making tenants responsible for the tax, which could increase revenue and address landlord exemptions. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Brijesh Verma on Apr 20, 2010
Dear Mr. Vijay, as far as the matter of High Court decision is concerned, the same has already been set aside by the amendments proposed to be made by Finance Bill 2010. Now, the lawmakers have specifically expressed that mere renting is a service in itself. So confusion regarding taxability is now no more persistent. However, since the amendment would be considered as carrying a Charging effect, so its retrospective applicability might be an issue in question. Keen look would also be given to section 76 of the Finance Bill 2010 which is "Validating Provision" which says that all previous demand would be collected along with interest and penalty. Overall, the liability for paying tax on rental Income has been confirmed, but a wait and watch situation remains untill the bill attains finality.
DEV KUMAR KOTHARI on Apr 25, 2010
The tenants who are eligible to avail CENVAT have no problem in paying ST, however, other tenatns are not willing to pay. The owners association should make representation to the Finance Minister to provide for rverse charge method- to make tenants liable to pay servie availed. This will benefit revenue also because in that case most of big entitiels taking commercial properties on rent will be liable to pay ST. Whereas in case of landlord liability, many landlords get exemption due to threshhold limit. The following article on this website may be referred to: Budget suggestion: Reverse charge method for tax on rent if the levy persist. CA Mrs. Uma Kothari
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues