Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Claim of benefit u/s 80c after declaration

Rahul Bagaria

Is it mandatory to declare your contribution to PF under 80C and claim benefit.This is more so when you have insurance premiums and housing loan principal amount to your disposal under 80C. What will be the taxability if the same PF amount is withdrawan in more than 5 years and less than 5 years

Forum Discussion Heats Up Over Section 80C Tax Benefits and Contribution Expectations A forum participant raised a query about claiming tax benefits under Section 80C for provident fund contributions, alongside insurance premiums and housing loan principal payments. A professional responded, suggesting the query was unclear and emphasized the need for detailed information. The discussion escalated with criticisms about the quality of responses and the contributor's role in the forum. Another participant criticized the original poster for raising numerous queries without contributing substantial content. The exchange highlighted tensions regarding the purpose of the forum, with emphasis on knowledge sharing rather than simply seeking free advice. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
CA UMA KOTHARI on Feb 3, 2010
Several issues are mixed-up, which is not proper for this column. Maximum deduction u/s 80C has a limitation if you have paid more than the same deduction will be restricted to limit applicable in particular year. inestment in PF should be accounted for and declared, otherwise it can be cosnidered as undisclosed investmetn out of undiclsoed income. I do'nt think at present PF withdrawals is taxable- However,please check latest provisions and enrich readers from your reading in this regard to serve the purpsoe of discussion forum. In my personal view this is a column to discuss and share knowledge and information and not simpy to get information or consultation free of cost. The query and related information provided are not suitable for discussion forum. The issue must contain full facts, and basic information gathered by the query raiser and then only a discussion can be initiated.
Rahul Bagaria on Feb 3, 2010
Uma, I don't forsee any issues being mixed in my views.Its a paid site and before coming to any conclusion on your own you shouild be equipped to judge other person worth and his background. As a matured professional, a matured reply was expected from you rather than some loose language.
DEV KUMAR KOTHARI on Jul 29, 2010
I am shocked to see your comments posted on 03.02.10. I have seen your profile, considering the same readers expect some sharing of knowledge you must have considering your seniority, maturity etc. However, I found you have raised 27 queries/ issues, under reply I find five items out of which only one is a reply to some other query and rest are all clarifications on your own queries. There is no article posted by you. In such circumstances do you think you are contributring to discussions by merely raising queries? I had made reply to most of your queries under issue id no. 1737 and the answers given by me were correct.What you found loose language? Do you knwo what loose language means? Have you read my reply properly? before making allegations. Better have your own SWOAT analysis angry man.
CA UMA KOTHARI on Jul 29, 2010
The reply dt.29.07.10 be consdiered by CA Uma Kothari due to some technical error there was no change in logging and logging of CA Dev Kumar Kothari continued. I am shocked to see your comments posted on 03.02.10. I have seen your profile, considering the same readers expect some sharing of knowledge you must have considering your seniority, maturity etc. However, I found you have raised 27 queries/ issues, under reply I find five items out of which only one is a reply to some other query and rest are all clarifications on your own queries. There is no article posted by you. In such circumstances do you think you are contributring to discussions by merely raising queries? I had made reply to most of your queries under issue id no. 1737 and the answers given by me were correct.What you found loose language? Do you knwo what loose language means? Have you read my reply properly? before making allegations. Better have your own SWOAT analysis angry man. CA UMA KOTHARI
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues