Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Interest on unsecured loan disallowed

satbir singhwahi

AO HAS U/S 40A(2) DISALLOWED INTEREST PAID TO RELATIVES @18% AND OTHERS @ 12%.I.E 6% HAS BEEN DISALLOWED.INTEREST PAID TO BANK 14.25% AND UNSECURED LOAN FROM RELATIVES WAS TAKEN TO TIDE OVER THE CRISIS AS BANK HAS REFUSED LIMITS AS MAJOR DEBTOR HAD GONE TO BIFR.WHETHER AO ACTION RIGHT???

Related-party interest scrutiny under section 40A(2) may disallow excessive rates absent evidence of commercial justification. AO applied Section 40A(2) to disallow part of interest paid to relatives as excessive relative to bank rates; the core question is whether higher interest to related parties was commercially justified when unsecured loans were taken to address a credit restriction, and the matter is primarily a factual inquiry requiring evidence to show the genuineness and reasonableness of the payments. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Rama Krishana on Dec 8, 2009
You may visit the following case: 2009 TMI - 32197 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT. In addition i am fully in agreement with the view of the Mr. Kothari that it is an issue of facts. If the facts shows that the interest paid to relatives is genuine, you would get the justice at the appropriate forum.
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues