Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 121014
Like 1 Bookmark

Interpretation of Rule 86B - Whether

Date 11 Jul 2026
Replies 7 Replies
Views 327 Views
Rule 86B interpretation turns on whether the last two financial years are fixed or shift dynamically through the GST year.
Interpretation of the first proviso to Rule 86B of the CGST Rules, 2017 was discussed in relation to the income-tax return filing condition requiring payment of income tax exceeding the prescribed threshold in each of the last two financial years for which the time limit under section 139(1) has expired. The issue was whether this exception should be applied dynamically for each GST tax period, with the relevant two financial years changing when a later due date expires during the year, or whether the two financial years should remain fixed throughout the GST financial year. (AI Summary)

Dear Experts,

I seek your views on the interpretation of clause (a) of the first proviso to Rule 86B of the CGST Rules, 2017.

Clause (a) provides that Rule 86B shall not apply where the registered person or the specified persons have paid income tax exceeding Rs. 1 lakh in each of the "last two financial years for which the time limit to file return of income under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act has expired."

The issue is whether the above expression has to be interpreted:

  1. Dynamically with reference to each tax period (month) in which Rule 86B is to be applied; or
  2. Once at the beginning of the financial year (say, in April), and the same two financial years continue to apply throughout that GST financial year.

For example, while examining the applicability of Rule 86B during FY 2026-27, should the exception under clause (a) be tested separately for each month? This question arises because the due date under section 139(1) for filing the income-tax return for FY 2025-26 may expire during FY 2026-27. Consequently, from that date onwards, the expression "last two financial years for which the time limit... has expired" would appear to refer to a different set of financial years.

In other words, should the relevant two financial years change during the course of the GST financial year upon expiry of the income-tax return due date, or should they remain fixed for the entire financial year based on the position prevailing in April?

7 answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Like 0
Replied on Jul 11, 2026
1.

The exception under Rule 86B applies dynamically to each tax period (month) based on the exact date of filing. Because the law uses the present perfect tense ("has expired"), the relevant look-back block of the "last two financial years" shifts automatically the moment a new Income Tax return due date passes mid-year, rather than remaining fixed from April.

Reply
Hide
Like 0
Replied on Jul 12, 2026
2.

Legal meaning of "Financial Year" cannot be disturbed.

Reply
Hide
Like 0
Replied on Jul 12, 2026
3.

Sir's reply is icing on the cake.

Reply
Hide
1 Reply Show or hide replies
Like 0
Replied on Jul 12, 2026
3.1.

Thanks a lot, Sir.

Like 0
Replied on Jul 12, 2026
4.

Sir's reply is icing on the cake.

Reply
Hide
Like 0
Replied on Jul 12, 2026
5.

Sir,

I agree with the view of Sri Kasthuri Sethi Ji.

Two financial years continue to apply throughout that GST financial year.

Reply
Hide
1 Reply Show or hide replies
Like 0
Replied on Jul 12, 2026
5.1.

Thanks a lot, Sir.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues