Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Rule 86B Annual payment of 1% differential liab

ARVIND JAIN

As per Rule 86B of GST , dealer has to pay 1% of input via the cash ledger only on a monthly basis. but dealer has paid it on lumpsum basis at year end , Is this allowable or does differential tax have to be paid via DRC 03 for shortfall in monthly  payments? This point was  raised in gst Audit visit ,  in Actual for respective FY 21-22 no tax was payable and the dealer has paid it all together in March 22 (as per monthly total difference ) instead of monthly. No change in total figure. Any remedy now?  Can we claim it as a refund for  tax paid by filing RFD form.

Payment of 1% differential liability under Rule 86B: annual lump-sum payment questioned; refund under section 54 suggested. Rule 86B imposes a monthly requirement to deposit a one percent differential liability into the cash ledger from input tax credits; the question is whether an annual lump-sum deposit satisfies this requirement or whether shortfalls must be regularised through DRC-03. The contributor reports no net tax liability for FY 2021-22 and a year-end payment matching aggregate monthly differentials. The advice given is that a payment when no tax was due constitutes an inadmissible payment and may be reclaimed by pursuing a refund under the refund provision, permitting restoration of cash where applicable. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Ganeshan Kalyani Yesterday

If no tax was payable then the tax paid is merely a payment. You can seek refund u/s 54.

ARVIND JAIN at 12:17 AM

Tax was  payable but as  per rule it should  be monthly and we paid at year end in March

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues