Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Consequences - export during lapse period

Narayanan Sethumadhavan

If a manufacturer exporter fails to renew his LUT for 3 months. But he exports goods during the lapse period. He renews the LUT after 3 months. IS there any consequences for the exports made during the particular 3 months ( where the LUT is not convered those 3 months)

Exporter Failed to Renew LUT; Exports Continued; Lapses Condoned with Proof of Export per Notification No. 42/2001-CE A manufacturer-exporter failed to renew their Letter of Undertaking (LUT) for three months but continued exporting goods during this period. A consultant explained that exporting under bond or LUT is crucial to avoid tax on exports, as outlined in Notification No. 42/2001-CE. Although non-furnishing of LUT is not simply procedural, such lapses can be condoned if proof of export is provided, as supported by the Eves Fashions case. Another participant agreed with this view, while a third sought advice on a similar situation, questioning if submitting export proof within 180 days would suffice. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues