Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Adjusted Total Turnover Computation

Rakesh Jain

'My Net ITC is already computed after the deduction as per Rule 42. Now, for refund calculation, am I again required to apply the proportionate formula by including exempted turnover in the adjusted total turnover? Wouldn't that amount to a double deduction?'

Taxpayer challenges proportionate refund formula after Net ITC computation under Rule 42 as potential double deduction A taxpayer questioned whether applying the proportionate formula for refund calculation after already computing Net ITC under Rule 42 constitutes double deduction. One respondent cited Rule 89(4)(E) defining 'Adjusted Total Turnover' as including turnover excluding exempt supplies other than zero-rated supplies. Another respondent acknowledged this as a significant issue arising during refund filing, suggesting taking entire credit in monthly returns, computing Rule 42/43 reversal, then reversing it, so refund calculations use the original ITC amount with proper computation methodology. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues