Can appeal be filed against the rectification order? The time limit to file appeal against the original order has expired.
Just a moment...
Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?
Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?
Can appeal be filed against the rectification order? The time limit to file appeal against the original order has expired.
Your query is of General nature, be specific for enabling us to revert, e.g. Appeal under the provisions of GST Laws, IT Laws or Customs Law.
Filing of an Appeal against Rectification Orders under GST Law when Limitation Period for Original Order Has Expired.
I. Legal Framework
Under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the rectification of errors and the right to appeal are governed respectively by:
II. Rectification under Section 161
Section 161 permits any authority who has passed a decision or order under the Act to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, either:
Such rectification must be carried out within six months from the date of the original order, unless the rectification is purely clerical or arithmetical in nature, which may be made at any time.
III. Appealability under Section 107
Section 107 confers the right to appeal to any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under the Act by an adjudicating authority. An appeal must ordinarily be filed within three months from the date of communication of the impugned order (with a permissible extension of one additional month upon showing sufficient cause).
IV. Whether a Rectification Order Is Appealable Where the Limitation for the Original Order Has Expired
It is a well-settled principle of law that:
This position finds indirect support in judicial precedents interpreting analogous provisions under other tax laws, and is consistent with principles of natural justice and statutory construction.
V. Practical Implications
Scenario | Right to Appeal | Remarks |
Rectification order adversely modifies the original order | ✅ Yes | Appeal maintainable against modified portion |
Rectification is clerical/arithmetical and non-prejudicial | ❌ No | No grievance, hence no appeal |
Time limit to appeal against the original order has expired, but rectification introduces new liability | ✅ Yes | Fresh limitation period arises in respect of modified content only |
Attempt to use rectification appeal to reopen original grounds | ❌ Not permissible | Appeal limited to rectification only |
VI. Conclusion
A rectification order passed under Section 161 of the CGST Act, 2017, which results in a modification of the original order adversely affecting the taxpayer, is appealable under Section 107, notwithstanding that the limitation period to challenge the original order may have expired. However, such appeal shall be confined strictly to the extent of the rectified portion, and shall not reopen matters conclusively decided in the original order that remain unaltered.
***
Are there any judgements by SC or other HCs on rectification order passed under section 161 which modifies or alters the original order in any manner prejudicial to the assessee, constitutes a fresh cause of action, giving rise to an independent right to appeal under Section 107?
An order of rectification under Section 161 is not independent of the Oreder-in-Original. Time limit mentioned in Section 107 will apply. Rectification of a clerical or an arithmetical error does not change the essence of the Order-in-Original.
Hence appeal cannot be filed against an Order of rectification.
If major changes take place in the disguise of rectification of error, that will amount to review of its own order. Then only option is to challenge the rectification order in High Court. Here is case law in favour of the assessee.
2022 (5) TMI 1074 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT - S.P.Y. AGRO INDUSTRIES Versus UNION OF INDIA
As already explained by the experts, rectification order is like any other order appealable under Section 107, subject to the time frame, conditions and merits of the case.
Sh.Sadanand Bulbule Ji,
Sir, Agree with your views at serial no.5 above.
Thank you so much Sir for your validation.