Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :

Print Options

+ Post a Query
Post a New Query ✕
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search ❮
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 119362
PrevPreviousNextNext
Like 0Bookmark

54th GST council meeting - notification no. 20/2024

Date 17 Oct 2024
Replies3 Replies
Views 950 Views
Prospective application of the sub rule amendment affirmed; past application may be open to ultra vires challenge under GST guidance.
Amendment or omission of sub rule 96(10) is to operate prospectively; advisory responses treat implementation as effective only from the amendment date. Stakeholders may consider challenging past application of the provision as ultra vires. Circular No. 233/27/2024 GST is cited as relevant administrative guidance. The replies are individual non professional views and not formal legal advice. (AI Summary)

Amendment / omission of sub rule 96(10) is retrospective or prospective Implementation.

Goods and Services Tax - GST
3 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Like 0
Replied on Oct 18, 2024
1.

Prospective.

Though for the past one may consider challenging the provision itself as it seems to be ultra vires.

Like 0
Replied on Oct 18, 2024
2.

It is prospective. 

Like 0
Replied on Oct 19, 2024
3.

You may also refer to Circular No. 233/27/2024-GST, dated 10th September, 2024.

These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion or recommendation.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues