Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Audit under Section 65 of CGST

Veeresham Veerabomma

Hi Sirs !!!

During the month of April and May, 2024 some of the Tax payers have been received Audit Notices under Section 65 of CGST Act for the year 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22. Subsequent to audit findings tax payers received the adjudication orders only for the year 2019-20 under Section 73. Such piecemeal assessments /adjudications are valid ?

Debate on Audit Notices Under Section 65 of CGST Act: Piecemeal Assessments Valid, Referencing Supreme Court Judgment. A discussion on a forum addressed audit notices under Section 65 of the CGST Act for multiple years, with adjudication orders issued only for 2019-20 under Section 73. Participants debated the validity of piecemeal assessments, with consensus that such actions are permissible under GST laws. A referenced Supreme Court judgment supports treating each assessment year separately. Some officers issued single adjudication orders for multiple years, which is allowed if the issues are identical. The forum emphasized the importance of fair justice and natural justice principles over administrative practices. Participants expressed gratitude for the shared insights and information. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues