Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Eway Bill Generation

VIGNESH

Dear Exprts.Kindly Clarrify. During financial year 2019-2020 multiple Eway bills were failed to be generated. But all supplies were inter state and within 10 kms radius and was to sister concern . Will there be general penalty or it will be for each Eway bill? Help me with any caselaw that i can quote.

Private company faces penalties for missing E-way bills; advice varies on leniency and requirement despite short distance. An individual from a private company sought advice on potential penalties for failing to generate E-way bills during the 2019-2020 fiscal year for inter-state supplies within a 10 km radius to a sister concern. Experts provided varying opinions: one suggested penalties apply per instance, another advised proving no revenue loss for leniency, while others emphasized the necessity of generating E-way bills despite the short distance. It was noted that penalties require a personal hearing, and technical glitches should be documented to support the case. No specific case law was available to favor the taxpayer at the time. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Shilpi Jain on Aug 13, 2024

The law lacks clarity on this. However, for e way bill there is a specific penalty u/s 129. So general penalty should not be applicable.

Also do make submissions to show that mutiple attempts to generate EWB were failed. This should also not lead to penalty.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Aug 15, 2024

The penalty is for each instance. 

KASTURI SETHI on Aug 16, 2024

If you can prove that there is no loss of revenue, this is a procedural/technical lapse only and nothing else. At present no specific case law in favour of the assessee is available. However, it is suggested that you may delay the adjudicating proceedings legally as far as possible. By the time the case is adjudicated, you may be come by some case law in your favour by High Court or Supreme Court.

Penalty cannot be imposed upon without personal hearing as per Section 129 (4) of the CGST Act and you can avail three adjournments as per Section 75 (5) of the Act. Three adjournments means four opportunities for personal hearing.

 I also agree with both experts.

Sadanand Bulbule on Aug 18, 2024

Dear Sir

Penalty under Section 129 applies only to the consignment of goods intercepted in "transit" for violation of any provisions of Section 68 read with Rule 138. In your case, supplies being in the nature of inter-state for 2019-2020, generation of E-way bill was mandatory. So distance of 10 kms does not help out overcome such lapse and penalty under Section 122[1][xiv] can be levied in respect of taxable goods not covered by specified documents. But you can justify your sincere attempts to generate the same, but for technical glitches it was not possible. Some times facts speak louder than law.

KASTURI SETHI on Aug 20, 2024

Sh.Sadanand Bulbule Ji,

               Sir,   I agree with your  views but  the party must have proof regarding technical glitches in order to prove their bona fides.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues