Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC CLAIMED AFTER DUE DATE

KAMAL SETHI

One of my clients filed GSTR-3B for March 2020 on October 31st, 2020. Subsequently, received DRC-01 to reverse the claimed credit along with interest. This action was taken in accordance with the provisions under section 16(4), as the Input Tax Credit (ITC) can only be claimed up to October 22nd, 2020. Could you please provide guidance on this matter

Supreme Court to Review Late ITC Claim Reversal Under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act; Relief Uncertain A client filed their GSTR-3B for March 2020 on October 31, 2020, and received a DRC-01 to reverse the claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC) with interest, as ITC claims were due by October 22, 2020, per Section 16(4) of the CGST Act. The issue is pending before the Supreme Court, with previous validation by several High Courts. One participant suggests maintaining the issue in some forum for potential relief if favorable judgments or policy changes occur. Historically, time restrictions on credit claims have been enforced to prevent misuse, making favorable outcomes uncertain. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Padmanathan KV on May 8, 2024

This issue is now pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Pls state what is the exact amount involved?

What is the exact stage of proceedings? whether any order has been passed? or are you yet to file a reply?

KASTURI SETHI on May 8, 2024

Sh.Kamal Sethi Ji,

(i) At present there is no remedy. The provisions of Section 16(4) of CGST Act have been held valid by the Patna High Court, Andhra Pradesh High Court & Chhattisgarh High Court.

(ii) The issuance of the SCN on this issue will be continued but will be kept pending adjudication till the decision of the Supreme Court.

(iii) In this context, see Circular No. 13/2023 dated 22.6.2023 issued by the Commissioner of State Tax, State GST Department, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Shilpi Jain on May 9, 2024

A weak case in my view unless any favourable verdict comes from high court/SC

KASTURI SETHI on May 9, 2024

Also go through Issue ID 119090.

Padmanathan KV on May 9, 2024

Depending on risk apitite of client and other factors inc amount involved etc, you may consider keeping the issue "alive" in some forum so that if some favourable judgement from court or policy decision from Governments comes, you maybe able to gain relief.

KASTURI SETHI on May 9, 2024

Time restriction had been enforced since the inception of Modvat Credit facility (March, 1986). Initially it was enforced for six months and, thereafter, changed to one year period. The reason behind such restriction was to iron out the possibility of taking credit twice or thrice on the same invoice. That was not era of high technology/computer/internet etc.

Even now in this era of high technology it is not feasible to keep track of such manipulation. So the intention of Govt. is to safeguard revenue. Keeping in view of logic and reason behind this restriction, chances of the decision in favour of the assessees are bleak.

Disclaimer : These are my personal views for academic purpose only

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues