Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

amendment to Rule 142A

Vel Murugan

Rule 142A has been amended by Notification No. 79/2020-CT dated 15.10.2020, replacing the word 'shall' with 'may' and it is effective from that date. Whether this amendment is applicable for the DRC-01 for the FY 2017-18? In other words, the issue of DRC-01A is a must for SCN for the years 2017-18 to 2019-20.

GST Rule 142A amendment makes DRC-01A notices discretionary, debated for retroactive application to 2017-2020 fiscal years. An amendment to GST Rule 142A, effective from 15.10.2020, changed the word 'shall' to 'may,' affecting the issuance of DRC-01A notices. Participants in the discussion debated whether this amendment applies retroactively to fiscal years 2017-18 to 2019-20. The consensus was that post-amendment, the issuance of DRC-01A is discretionary, allowing officers to issue notices for past periods based on case specifics. A referenced court decision supports this interpretation, although one participant expressed disagreement with its reasoning. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues