Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Status of Sale

Ajay tripathi

Seller & Buyer are located in Delhi & goods consigned to MP(interstate). Seller charging 2% cst Agst C forms from buyer whom located in Delhi( E1 Sale) .pls confirm the status of sale.

Interstate Sale Validity Affirmed: Seller and Buyer in Same State, Goods Consigned Elsewhere with C & E-1 Forms A query was raised regarding the status of a sale involving a seller and buyer both located in Delhi, with goods consigned to Madhya Pradesh, and a 2% CST charged against C forms. The first reply suggested that such transactions are common and acceptable when conducted with C forms and E-1 forms. The second reply referenced legal precedents where the Allahabad High Court and Madras High Court recognized similar transactions as interstate sales, even when both parties are in the same state, due to the transfer of the document of title to goods. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues