Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Composition Dealer

Bayyareddy DK

sir,

My client a hotelier is paying Karnataka VAT under composition scheme. In the year 2011-12 & 12-23, entered a joint development agreement in a new venture to construct hotel rooms 50/50. On advances received, voluntarily paid tax @4%. Separate books maintained for Hotel and construction services. Option of selecting 4% composition on construction services is not intimated to VAT office. Officer reassessed the taxes @ 14.5% on construction advances?. My client is a eligible dealer for composition scheme but not submitted the option leads to higher rate of Tax?. Please advice.

Hotelier Faces 14.5% VAT on Construction Advances Due to Missing Composition Scheme Option Submission for 2011-13 A hotelier client, paying Karnataka VAT under the composition scheme, entered a joint development agreement in 2011-12 and 2012-13 to construct hotel rooms on a 50/50 basis. The client voluntarily paid a 4% tax on advances received, maintaining separate books for hotel and construction services. However, the option to select 4% composition on construction services was not communicated to the VAT office, leading to a reassessment at 14.5% on construction advances. The client is eligible for the composition scheme but failed to submit the required option, resulting in a higher tax rate. Advice is sought on this issue. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Bayyareddy DK on Jan 26, 2023

sir,

My client a hotelier is paying Karnataka VAT under composition scheme. In the year 2011-12 & 12-13, entered a joint development agreement in a new venture to construct hotel rooms 50/50. On advances received, voluntarily paid tax @4%. Separate books maintained for Hotel and construction services. Option of selecting 4% composition on construction services is not intimated to VAT office. Officer reassessed the taxes @ 14.5% on construction advances?. My client is a eligible dealer for composition scheme but not submitted the option leads to higher rate of Tax?. Please advice.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues