Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

GST on Residential Project

Kaustubh Karandikar

As per the Notification, the GST Rate for Construction of affordable residential apartments by a promoter in a Residential Real Estate Project is 1.5% (0.75 + 0.75). However, under commentaries in the Taxmann website and many other places, it is mentioned as 1% (0.5 + 0.5). Please guide.

Clarifying GST Rate for Affordable Housing: Officially 1.5% but Effectively 1% Due to Land Abatement Disclosure. A discussion on the Goods and Services Tax (GST) rate for affordable residential apartments in a Residential Real Estate Project reveals a discrepancy between the official rate and common interpretations. Officially, the GST rate is 1.5% (0.75% + 0.75%), but due to a 1/3 abatement for land value, the effective rate is considered 1%. Participants agree that for disclosure purposes, the rate should be stated as 1.5% to reflect the actual calculation basis. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correct disclosure practices in GST records and tax invoices. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Amit Agrawal on Dec 24, 2022

Both things are correct, if taken from angle of generally followed trade practices of expression.

The actual tax-rate of 1.5% becomes effective rate of 1% of total consideration once you reduce 'deemed value of one third of the total consideration for such supply' towards the 'value of transfer of land or undivided share of land' so as to arrive at 'value of construction services for payment of gst'.

In other words, 2/3 (1.5%) = 1%.

These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion.

Kaustubh Karandikar on Dec 24, 2022

Thanks Amit Sir for yur quick and accurate guidance.

Padmanathan KV on Dec 26, 2022

In my humble opinion, the correct rate of tax is 1.5% (0.75% + 0.75%). However, since 1/3 abatement is given to the land value, the effective rate will be 1%.

For disclosure in returns, the value after abatement of land must be under declared under 1.5% rate

Shilpi Jain on Dec 26, 2022

Agreed. The rate of tax is actually 1.5% and the deduction of 1/3rd given is only in the valuation.

This is the manner in which the disclosure should also be made in the returns. Many times it is seen that the taxpayers disclose rate of tax as 1% and 5% instead of 1.5% and 7.5% for affordable and other than affordable residential projects

Amit Agrawal on Dec 27, 2022

I agree with Ms. Shilpi Mam that for disclosure under GST records / submissions, tax-invoices etc., tax-payer should disclose tax-rate @ 1.5% or 7.5% (& not 1% or 5%), as the case may be and taxable value as ''2/3 of 'total consideration which includes land'' (& not 100% of 'total consideration which includes land).

These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion.

Amit Agrawal on Dec 27, 2022

Though my post at serial number 1 states the same thing, it is better to give further clarity for better understanding for everyone.

Kaustubh Karandikar on Dec 27, 2022

thanks amit ji and shilpi ji for your support as always

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues