Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

STOCK VARIATION DEFECT in audit by the department

SK Krishna

Hello sirs/madam,

The dealer is an iron and steel wholesaler & distributor with large turnover . During the audit, the department arrived at stock difference/ stock variation defect between physical stock and book stock maintained. Physical stock value was arrived barely on eye estimation only. Please discuss appropriate CASE LAWS to file detailed objections.

Thanks you.

Iron and Steel Wholesaler Challenges Audit Discrepancy Using Case Laws Against Eye Estimation Method A wholesaler and distributor of iron and steel with a significant turnover faced an audit revealing a discrepancy between physical stock and recorded stock, determined through mere eye estimation. The discussion seeks case laws to support objections against this method. A respondent highlighted that eye estimation is insufficient for establishing stock shortage offenses, citing several favorable case laws for the assessee. The original poster expressed gratitude for the timely and precise response, appreciating the assistance provided in addressing the audit issue. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues