Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

NCLT/NCLAT

THYAGARAJAN KALYANASUNDARAM

Dear Experts,

One of my clients procured goods from the supplier regularly and he was given a blank cheque at the inception of the translations. My client has not paid some of the payments due to some quality issues which relate to 3 years back transactions. Later, the supplier filled the cheque and remitted it into the bank which was originally given for security purposes got bounced. Now, the supplier initiated the NCLT process and got the order in favour from the NCLT without considering the Limitation period even after stressing by the counsel, however if we count from the cheque bounced date it would be within the time, but the cheque given only for security purposes. Now my query is that can we file a further appeal before NCLAT for remedy?

thanks in advance.

Supplier Wins Cheque Dispute Despite Time-Bar Argument; Client Plans Appeal to NCLAT Over Payment Withholding Issues. A client provided a supplier with a blank cheque for security during regular transactions. Due to unresolved quality issues from three years ago, the client withheld some payments. The supplier later filled the cheque, which bounced when deposited. Despite the client's counsel arguing that the claim was time-barred, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) ruled in favor of the supplier. The client is considering appealing to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) for a remedy. An expert confirmed that an appeal to the NCLAT is possible. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues