Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Availment of wrongly charged GST Read more at: https://www.caclubindia.com/experts/browse.asp

Guest

I am a registered person in Maharashtra and for business purpose had travelled to Karnataka and stayed in hotel. The hotel charged IGST instead of CGST + SGST. Now the department audit is conducted and the officers are denying the availment of IGST paid by me. Whether, the officers are right ?, if yes, than by which section they can invoke to disallow my availment of IGST?

Business Traveler Challenges IGST Charge Instead of CGST + SGST; Seeks Clarification on Tax Credit Denial. A registered individual in Maharashtra traveled to Karnataka for business and stayed at a hotel that charged IGST instead of CGST + SGST. During a department audit, officers denied the availment of the IGST paid. The individual seeks clarification on the officers' decision and the applicable section for disallowing the IGST claim. A respondent noted the issue's complexity and suggested that resolution might require escalation to the Supreme Court. Additionally, the respondent emphasized the importance of the place of supply mentioned by the hotel, questioning if it was the individual's home state. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues