Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Export With payment of Tax (Intertwining of GST Refunds with Benefits under Advance Authorization)

Arpit Patel

Department of CGST ( senior intelligent officer) have issued summons under section 70 of Central GST regarding restriction under Rule 96(10) is only in the context of claiming refund of the IGST paid on the exports if the given person has availed the benefit of IGST exemption on imports against Advance Authorization under Notf. No. 79/2017 – Customs dt. 13.10.2017 claiming the IGST exemption on imports.

Sec. 16(3) of the IGST Act, 2017 provides for two routes to claim the refund of the accumulated ITC in case of zero-rated supplies.The claiming of the refund under each of the given two routes is subject to such conditions, safeguards and procedure as prescribed. Can a blanket restriction under Rule 96(10) on opting for the with payment route in cases where the IGST exemption has been claimed against Advance Authorization be considered as “conditions, safeguards and procedure” which have been prescribed by virtue of Sec. 16(3) of the IGST Act and section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017?

IGST calimed as exempt amount is very huge so we can fight against the authority and challenge rule 96(10) in court , If the department considering recent honorable Gujarat high court judgment in the case of Cosmo Films Ltd. v. UOI (SCA No.15833 of 2018) = 2020 (10) TMI 1099 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT had an occasion to examine the said Rule 96(10). The Court held that the said restriction shall apply from 23.10.2017. Further the Court held that the exporters who have availed the refund are required to pay back the IGST claimed as exempt on imports along with interest.

Debate on GST refund claims and Advance Authorization benefits under Rule 96(10) and Section 16(3) sparks legal scrutiny. A discussion on the Goods and Services Tax (GST) forum raised concerns about the interplay between GST refunds and benefits under Advance Authorization. A query was initiated regarding the restriction under Rule 96(10) of the Central GST, which limits claiming refunds of IGST paid on exports if IGST exemption on imports was availed. The issue questions whether this restriction aligns with the conditions and procedures outlined in Section 16(3) of the IGST Act and Section 54 of the CGST Act. A recent Gujarat High Court ruling in Cosmo Films Ltd. v. UOI was referenced, which upheld the restriction from October 23, 2017, requiring exporters to repay exempted IGST with interest. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues