Dear sirs,
As per policy of one of our clients, they provide mobile phone to employees as per their pay scale. For example, Scale A employees are allowed phones upto ₹ 10,000/-. If employee intends to purchase more expensive mobile, say for ₹ 15000, then balance of 5,000/- is recovered from him.
Now in effect, mobile is capitalised by 10,000/- in books but GST ITC is taken on entire invoice value of 15000. Whether this is correct or instead recovery of 5000/- should be treated as sale and corresponding ITC reversed?
Debate on GST Input Tax Credit: Should ITC be reversed on employee-recovered phone cost exceeding company policy? A client provides mobile phones to employees based on their pay scale, with a policy allowing Scale A employees to receive phones up to 10,000. If an employee opts for a more expensive phone, the excess cost is recovered from them. The client capitalizes the phone at 10,000 but claims GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the full invoice amount of 15,000. One expert advises reversing the ITC on the 5,000 recovered from the employee, as this amount effectively belongs to the employee. Another expert notes that if the asset is capitalized with GST, ITC cannot be claimed. (AI Summary)