Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Place of supply

Kaustubh Karandikar

XYZ is registered with GST in Maharashtra. XYZ is supplying the goods to PQR who is the buyer of the goods. PQR is registered with GST in Maharashtra. XYZ issuing invoice to PQR on ex – works basis and handing over the goods at factory gate in Maharashtra. In the invoice, XYZ is mentioning PQR as buyer but consignee is not mentioned even though XYZ is aware that PQR will be in turn supplying the goods to a customer outside Maharashtra. As per the recent ruling of the ‘Authority of Advance Ruling, Telangana’ in the case of ‘Penna Cement Industries’, manufacturer of cement, makes inter-State sales of cement on ex- factory/work basis. The question before the AAR was, when they make ex-factory sales from their plant, delivery terminates at their factory gate itself and therefore, CGST and SGST should be charged on such type of supplies. As per AAR Ruling, IGST is chargeable on ex-factory inter-State supplies. However, in my view, in the case of Penna Cement, the customer was located in different state which had lifted the delivery on ex – factory basis from another state and therefore IGST is chargeable. However, in my example given above, XYZ and PQR both are in same state i.e. Maharashtra and therefore even though PQR is taking the delivery ex – factory and even though PQR is ultimately selling the goods to a customer in different state, since XYZ and PQR both are in Maharashtra, XYZ need to charge CGST + SGST. Guidance of the experts please on my views.

GST Clarified: CGST and SGST Apply for Intra-State Sale Between XYZ and PQR; PQR to Charge IGST for Out-of-State Sale. A discussion on a forum addresses the GST implications for a transaction between two parties, XYZ and PQR, both registered in Maharashtra. XYZ supplies goods to PQR on an ex-works basis, and the query revolves around whether CGST and SGST or IGST should be charged. The consensus among respondents is that since both parties are in Maharashtra, CGST and SGST apply to the transaction. Even if PQR subsequently sells the goods to a customer in another state, XYZ is responsible only for intra-state taxes, while PQR must charge IGST for its inter-state sale. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues