Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC claim on construction of mall

KARAN VERMA

Dear Sir

If i construct mall/shops and let out on rent @ 18% GST, then whether i am eligible to claim ITC on payment made to various work contractors for construction of building or any D.G set, A/C plant self purchased.

Debate on Claiming ITC for Mall Construction Costs Under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017 A discussion on a forum addressed whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be claimed for construction costs of a mall, which is then rented out with 18% GST. Multiple contributors highlighted that ITC is generally restricted under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, particularly for works contract services. The issue is currently under review by the Supreme Court, following an Orissa High Court judgment, and opinions vary on whether ITC should be claimed pending the court's decision. Some suggest not utilizing ITC until clarity is provided, while others advise caution due to potential legal risks. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Atul Rathod on Nov 11, 2019

Ineligible in accordance with sec 17(5) the act. I guess your query is coming from orrisa high court judgement, the same has been challenged in apex court by the revenue department.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Nov 11, 2019

The credit is restricted on works contract service in terms of section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017.

SIVARAMA KUMAR on Nov 11, 2019

Since your query is based on the orissa high court judgement, there is a possibility that the apex court would consider the issue favourably. what merits in the judgement is when the GST chain is not broken, and it is not expended on own account ( but for furtherance of business thereby generating a taxable income) . Plain reading of the section prevents the admissability but the logic behind the inadmissability seems to be unfair.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Nov 11, 2019

Advance ruling may be sought seeking clarity on the issue.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Nov 11, 2019

Construction of factory building and civil work within the factory is also in course and furtherance of the business. But the credit is restricted. Exception is not given in law if the same activity has been carried out for renting of the immovable property. Therefore the department going by the law may not allow to take credit.

KASTURI SETHI on Nov 12, 2019

The matter is sub judice. The ball is in the court of Supreme Court. Taking such ITC is risk-prone. Better not to take ITC. There is possibility that the Apex Court may take at least one year. So you will have to cool your heels.

Alkesh Jani on Nov 12, 2019

Sir,

In this regards, my point of view is that, Para 5(b) of Schedule-II is reproduced below for ready reference

“(b) construction of a complex, building, civil structure or a part thereof, including a complex or building intended for sale to a buyer, wholly or partly, except where the entire consideration has been received after issuance of completion certificate, where required, by the competent authority or after its first occupation, whichever is earlier……..”

In view of the above, it can be said that construction services is said to be completed on issuance of certification, and as the construction service is deemed to be completed, now that civil structure can be termed as residential or commercial complex, as per the approved plan. So ITC for construction service is restricted under Section 17(5), however, Renting of immovable property comes into play only after the issuance of Certificate.

I do agree the decision of Apex court is vital, but till than it is wise not to take such ITC.

Thanks,

With Regards

DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on Nov 12, 2019

Let us wait for the Supreme Court judgment in this regard.

Atul Rathod on Nov 12, 2019

Would suggest you to avail the itc but don’t utilize. And inform the department.

KASTURI SETHI on Nov 13, 2019

The department would issue show cause notice. The registered person(tax payer) should not be swayed away by the judgment of any court.

SIVARAMA KUMAR on Nov 14, 2019

Construction of an immovable property where in progressive payments received establishes the fact the property is for sale and taxed for construction services but no ITC eligible.

Construction of an immovable property wherein the payments are received after getting the completion certificate no gst is applicable. since exempted no ITC allowed.

Construction of an immovable property made on own account and used for business purposes for self no ITC available.

Construction of an immovable property not sold, not used for business purposes for self, but used to generate taxable income in the form of rentals for commercial establishments,ITC is not available.

Hence only the supreme court should decide the basis for charging Gst on the rental income of an immovable property being taxed under both income tax and GST.Rental income constitutes not only for building but also for the land portion. But the entire rentals is subject to tax.

However your query invited much learning thanks a lot.

HariKishan Bhonagiri on Dec 5, 2019

The Orissa High court judgement pronounced not based on Law and it is based on Equity. Applicability of that provision to specific issue is tested. However that issue is in General nature may be applicable for all.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues