Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Utilise Input on Single Time Premium Payment on Lease Land Purchase

Pandiyan Perumal

We Bought 99 years lease land in May 2016 and paid service tax as per the service tax Act. And Utilized the same as Input against our central excise payments. Now the GST team conduct audit and they say it is ineligible credit. Please advise us.

Party Challenges Ineligible Cenvat Credit Claim on 99-Year Lease Land Under GST Audit; Seeks Proof of Manufacture Use A party purchased 99-year lease land in May 2016 and paid service tax, utilizing it as input against central excise payments. During a GST audit, it was deemed ineligible credit. The respondent advised that the Cenvat Credit might fall under an exclusion clause and suggested proving that the credit was used in manufacturing and clearance of dutiable final products, without being under the exclusion clause. Further details were requested for a comprehensive response. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on Oct 17, 2019

It appears that availment of Cenvat Credit fell under exclusion clause during that period. You are to prove that Cenvat Credit was utilized in or in relation to the manufacture and clearance dutiable final productn and at the same time such availment was not under exclusion clause. If you want comprehensive and fool-proof reply, pl. elaborate your query.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues