Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC on Greenhouse structure for ETP plant

Yatin Bhopi

We are manufacturer of Organic chemicals. We have recently installed greenhouse structure falling under HSN 9406 for our effluent treatment plant. expenses will be capitalised under Buildings.

Please let me know whether ITC will be available?

Eligibility of Input Tax Credit for Greenhouse Structures Under CGST Act 2017 Clarified by Experts A manufacturer of organic chemicals inquired about the eligibility for Input Tax Credit (ITC) on a greenhouse structure installed for an effluent treatment plant, capitalized under buildings. One expert clarified that ITC is available for capital goods used in business, as per the CGST Act, 2017. Another advised that the outward supply must be taxable and ITC should not be capitalized with the asset. A third expert noted that ITC is admissible for plant and machinery, excluding depreciation conditions, and cited a CESTAT Mumbai judgment supporting the classification of a greenhouse structure as a plant. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Sep 27, 2019

Sir,

According to Section 2 (19) of CGST Act, 2017 “capital goods” means goods, the value of which is capitalised in the books of account of the person claiming the input tax credit and which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business. Therefore you are eligible to avail ITC of gst paid on the capital goods.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Sep 27, 2019

Needless to mention, the outward supply should be taxable. And the input tax should not be capitalized along with the asset to claim credit. Either claim credit or capitalize it and claim the depreciation under IT.

KASTURI SETHI on Sep 27, 2019

Section 17(5)(c) &(d) of CGST Act

(c) works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service;

(d) goods or services or both received by a taxable person for construction of an immovable property (other than plant or machinery) on his own account including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business.

Explanation. - For the purposes of clauses (c) and (d), the expression “construction” includes re-construction, renovation, additions or alterations or repairs, to the extent of capitalisation, to the said immovable property;

In my view, there is not any kind of restriction on plant & machinery regarding availment of ITC on plant and machinery (except depreciation condition). Thus if you are able to prove that 'Greenhouse structure' is a plant', ITC is admissible. Plant and machinery stand excluded from the exclusion clause and hence not hit by Section 17 (5)(c) &(d). Views from others may also be welcomed. This is my view and interpretation. Other experts may or may not differ.

CESTAT Mumbai in the undermentioned judgement has held that greenhouse structure is a plant. This case law is based on various judgements (including Supreme Court) and Board's circulars. Kindly go through are case laws and circulars word for word.

2018 (8) G.S.T.L. 276 (Tri. - Mumbai) = 2017 (9) TMI 937 - CESTAT MUMBAI SRIROZ CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., PUNE-I

Yatin Bhopi on Sep 30, 2019

Thanks a lot for clarifying and sharing case law

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues