Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

REMIDIES IF GTA HAS FOLLOWED FCM AND RCM IN THE SAME PERIOD

CHVN KUMAR

HI every one

Please provide your valuable opinion for the following

1. GTA has followed the same methods for invoice raising i.e., FCM and RCM in the same period.

2. Department has any right to convert entire turnover into taxable i.e, FCM

Is there any directon / provision there in the Act in this regard?

What are the remidies available for GTA in this regard

GST Law Requires Clear Choice Between FCM and RCM; Hybrid Invoicing Not Allowed, Potential Penalties Possible A discussion on a forum addresses the issue of a Goods Transport Agency (GTA) using both Forward Charge Mechanism (FCM) and Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) for invoicing within the same period. The forum participants agree that there is no remedy for this lapse, as the GST law requires a clear choice between FCM and RCM. The tax department has the authority to treat the entire taxable turnover under FCM, and a Show Cause Notice (SCN) may be issued for penalties and tax differentials. The principle of unjust enrichment may apply, but recent judgments suggest refunds are not possible if service tax is paid inadvertently. Hybrid procedures are not permissible. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on Jun 2, 2019

There is no remedy to this lapse. I have already replied on this issue in this forum a few months back. Filing an option for FCM is requirement of GST law. The Board has already issued clarification in the form of FAQ on this issue. Now the SCN will be issued for imposition of penalty. Differential amount of tax along with interest will also be demanded. The department has statutory power to treat the whole taxable value under FCM. Issuance of an invoice under FCM is itself an option for FCM for the financial year. Invoice is also a sort of contract.

YAGAY andSUN on Jun 6, 2019

Priciple of unjust enrichment may apply. However in recent judgment refund cannot be filed even service tax is paid inadvertently.

KASTURI SETHI on Jun 6, 2019

Rightly advised by M/s.Yagay and Sun, Sirs. Thanks & regards for offering your views on the issue. Now the picture on the issue is very much clear. It is beyond doubt that the party can not adopt hybrid procedure.

YAGAY andSUN on May 24, 2020

If any hybrid system is adopted then, Government will assume the tax paid on higher side was liable to be paid and any short paid tax will collected by issuance of SCN.

KASTURI SETHI on May 24, 2020

Dear Sir,

I am also of the same view.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues