Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC OF PLYWOOD AND HARDWARE ITEMS

RAHUL GAIKWAD

My Client is Furniture Manufacturer and He is also manufacturing furniture for Banks according to Bank design and demand. In such case he purchases various item i.e plywood, laminates, hardware item for manufacturing of Furniture which is moveable or immovable. Then ITC is admissible for My Client.?

Furniture Manufacturer Eligible for Input Tax Credit on Moveable Furniture, Says Ruling; Highlights CGST Act 2017 Distinction. A furniture manufacturer inquires about the eligibility for Input Tax Credit (ITC) under GST for materials used in manufacturing furniture, including items for banks. One respondent argues that ITC is not admissible as the items are for immovable property, while another suggests ITC is permissible for moveable furniture. The discussion references a decision by the Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling, which supports the manufacturer's eligibility for ITC, providing legal clarity. The conversation highlights the distinction between moveable and immovable property concerning ITC eligibility under the CGST Act 2017. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on May 21, 2019

It is clearly a situation of works contract service. All the items are meant for immovable property. Though some items are moveable, yet its ultimate use is for immovable property. ITC is not admissible.

KASTURI SETHI on May 21, 2019

Also go through the replies against Issue ID 114978 dated 17.5.2019. Reply posted by Sh.Sharad Anada Ji is comprehensive and worth reading. This reply can help you in arriving at correct decision.

RAHUL GAIKWAD on May 22, 2019

90% he makes table and sofas which are moveable in nature.? Then.?

SHARAD ANADA on May 22, 2019

Furniture manufacturer is eligible for ITC on input and input services. He is using this input and input services for manufacturing of furniture. Furniture is goods for them. Or we can say he his providing works contract services. When supplier is using input and input services for providing taxable output supply then he is eligible for ITC.

But from recipient point of view it may be movable or immovable. If it's immovable for recipient then GST charged by furniture manufacturer is blocked credit for him under sec 17(5) of CGST Act 2017.

For eg. A contractor is providing commercial building construction services by using input and input services in that case he is eligible for ITC. But from recipient point of view it's immovable porpery and recipient is not eligible for ITC charged by contractor.

RAHUL GAIKWAD on May 22, 2019

Ok

Means contractor is eligible for ITC....

SHARAD ANADA on May 22, 2019

In my view Yes

RAHUL GAIKWAD on May 22, 2019

ohk...

KASTURI SETHI on May 22, 2019

Dear Querist,. AAR, Rajasthan in the case of Applicant , namely, Rambagh Palace Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Has decided your issue in favour of the party'. Every issue and reply is worth reading. All your confusions are cleared in this decision. Reported as 2019 (24) GSTL. 691 (AAR-GST) =2019 (5) TMI 248 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING - RAJASTHAN. Although this decision is specifically meant for the applicant, yet you can get legal support and on this very basis you can also go for Advance Ruling.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues