Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 114214
Like 0 Bookmark

Rate of GST on RO Booster Pumps

Date 08 Oct 2018
Replies 2 Replies
Views 9176 Views
GST classification for RO booster pumps disputed, with conflicting advice on HSN coding and applicable rate.
Query on GST classification of RO booster pumps: one reply advised HSN 84139190 with an 18% GST rate; the querant disputed that HSN, contending it covers hand pumps and attracts a 5% GST rate, leaving HSN coding and applicable GST rate for the pumps in contention. (AI Summary)

Please advice us HSN code and rate of duty of

Reverse Osmosis (RO) Booster Pumps

2 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Like 0
Replied on Oct 9, 2018
1.

HSN Code is 84139190 & Rate of GST is 18% on R O Booster Pump.

Like 0
Replied on Oct 9, 2018
2.

Sir, 84139190 belong to hand pumps and applicable GST on the same is @ 5%, if i am not wrong.

Recent Issues