Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Central Excise Interest Eligibility

Abhishek Tiwari

We had paid excise duty in 2000 under protest as demanded by CCE ,we appealed and matter went upto Supreme Court which dropped the proceedings in 2017. We have received refund,so I wanted to check can I claim interest on the additional duty(under protest) from 2000 to 2017 .And if yes then what % .And under which section ?

Thanks

Abhishek

Claiming Interest on Excise Duty Paid Under Protest: Challenges and Considerations Post-Supreme Court Ruling A party inquired about claiming interest on excise duty paid under protest from 2000 to 2017, following a Supreme Court decision in their favor. One response highlighted that interest is not typically granted unless claimed in the initial appeal, suggesting the issue should have been raised earlier. Another response explained that interest typically accrues after a specified period post-judgment, not retroactively. The final response advised checking the Supreme Court's order for specific mentions of interest. The consensus was that pursuing interest might be challenging but not impossible. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues