Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Late fee due to fraud

Gurpreet Singh

I need help.i had take registration in exise on December 2014 .i had purchased a machine on march 2014.that means before 9 months of registration.but my c.a has done one fraud with me he gave me fraud ecknolegment.due to this exise make a penalty on me.but they are not giving me input of this machine.please guide me how can i take this input.and aslo help me how my penalty can waveoff.

Individual Penalized for Alleged Fraud by CA; Advised to Appeal and Report CA to ICAI for Misconduct An individual sought advice on a discussion forum regarding a penalty imposed by the excise department due to alleged fraud by their Chartered Accountant (CA). The individual had registered for excise in December 2014 after purchasing a machine in March 2014. The CA allegedly provided fraudulent acknowledgment, leading to penalties and denial of input credit for the machine. Respondents advised filing an appeal with evidence and suggested that penalties might be waived due to lack of malintent. They also recommended reporting the CA to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) for further action. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues