Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Labour Job

SURYAKANT MITHBAVKAR

We are manufacturer of pharma machine registered under Excise Act.

We are having one associate company manufacturing pharma machine registered under Excise Act

Can we do labour job for each other issuing service tax invoice and using 214/86 Challan for movement of material.

Pharmaceutical Machine Maker Queries Excise Duty vs. Service Tax for Labor Jobs Under Notification 214/86-CE A manufacturer of pharmaceutical machines, registered under the Excise Act, inquired about the feasibility of performing labor jobs for an associate company, also registered under the Excise Act, using service tax invoices and the 214/86 Challan for material movement. Responses clarified that if the process amounts to manufacturing, excise duty applies, otherwise service tax applies. Notification No. 214/1986-CE allows for the return of processed goods without duty payment if the process is manufacturing. Pure labor jobs attract service tax, but job work under Notification 214/86 does not. The principal manufacturer must pay excise duty, exempting the job worker. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Ganeshan Kalyani on Mar 15, 2017

If the process amounts to manufacture then excise duty is applicable and if not then service tax is applicable. This is basic criteria.Thanks.

KASTURI SETHI on Mar 15, 2017

I agree with the views of Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani, Sir. Further I add that Notification No.7/17-ST dated 2.2.17 (which will come into force from the date of enactment) must be taken care of. "Any process amounting to manufacture ----------" etc.has been brought under Notification No.25/12-ST as amended at serial no.30.There is a world of difference between "Negative List" and " Exempted List".

Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Mar 15, 2017

Sir,

If you avail Notification No. 214/1986-CE then the process undertaken by you will be manufacture and you need not pay service tax. Since you are availing Notification No. 214/1986-CE you can return the processed goods without payment of duty to your unit where the production of the machinery is completed.

Sl. No. 30 (ii) (c) of Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated 20.6.2012 as amended exempts "Services by way of carrying out any intermediate production process as job work not amounting to manufacture or production in relation to any goods excluding alcoholic liquors for human consumption, on which appropriate duty is payable by the principal manufacturer. In this case also you need not pay any service tax if the process carried out by you second unit is intermediate production process and appropriate duty is paid by first unit.

YAGAY andSUN on Mar 15, 2017

Pure labour job will attract only service tax and Notification 214/86 would not be applicable.

Himansu Sekhar on Mar 15, 2017

Job work amounting to manufacture under notf. 214/86 will not attract service tax. It may be done for each other.

Nash Industries I Pvt Ltd on Mar 16, 2017

The condition of 214/86 is that the principal manufacturer (the person sending the goods) undertakes to pay the excise duty and that the job worker is exempted.

As the process amounts to manufacture, is exempt from the levy of service tax. However, it is taxable under GST.

DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on Mar 20, 2017

I endorse the views of Shri Renganathan.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues