Just a moment...

⚠✕
Report
FeedbackReport
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error ✕
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :

Print Options

+ Post a Query
Post a New Query ✕
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search ❮
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 111624
PrevPreviousNextNext
- 0 -

Impact of JBM Industries CESTAT decision reported in 2017 (2) TMI 1036

Date 15 Mar 2017
Replies2 Answers
Views 1098 Views
Asked By

The decision appears to be flawed. The intention of the legislation to provide for N/N 67/95 CE dated 16.03.1995 has been totally negated by this judgment.

This judgment has wide ramifications across industry as the revenue based on this judgment shall pounce on assessees.

Would appreciate, if you could let us know whether the appeal has been filed in HC against this order or any stay has been granted.

Thanks and Regards

S.Ramaswamy

Central Excise
2 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on Mar 15, 2017
1.

Please check P&H High Court website in this regard.
- 0
Replied on Mar 16, 2017
2.

thanks. however could not get the details.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues