Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

FIM Value calculating

Guest

Dear Sir,

We awarded a contract to civil party,

We providing Cement, Steel, and Structural steel for construction. can i calculate Structural steel value for service tax calculation (Free issue material).

Currently we are calculating Cement & Steeel value for service tax calculation.

I am confuse, structural steel value calculate or not.

Please advice.

Thanks & Regards,

Sanjay Vasava

Free Structural Steel Not Part of Service Tax Under Section 67, But Pay Under Protest to Avoid Penalties A forum participant inquires about whether the value of structural steel provided for free should be included in service tax calculations. Multiple respondents cite a Supreme Court case and a Tribunal decision, indicating that free materials supplied by the service recipient are not part of the gross amount charged under Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, due to ongoing legal disputes, it is suggested to include the value in the taxable amount and pay under protest to avoid penalties, with the possibility of a refund if the decision favors the assessee. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on Feb 22, 2017

Valuation (Service Tax) - Free material supply by service recipient, value thereof whether includible in gross amount charged by service provider?

The Supreme Court Bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal on 11-7-2016 after condoning the delay issued notice in the Civil Appeal Diary No. 16064 of 2016 filed by Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad against the CESTAT Final Order No. A/11251/2015-WZB/AHD, dated 3-9-2015 as reported in2016 (44) S.T.R. 299 (Tri. - Ahmd.) = 2015 (9) TMI 1533 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD (Corrtech International Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner). While issuing the notice, the Supreme Court passed the following order :

“Delay condoned.

Issue notice.

Tag with Civil Appeal Nos. 8148-8149 of 2014.”

The Appellate Tribunal in its impugned order had followed the Larger Bench’s decision in reported at 2013 (32)Bhayana Builders S.T.R. 49 (Tri.-LB) =2013 (9) TMI 294 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB) and held that the value of goods/materials supplied free by the service recipient for providing services was not includible in the gross amount charged by the service provider under Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 as same cannot be said to be monetary or non-monetary extra consideration.

[Commissioner v. Corrtech International Pvt. Ltd. - 2016 (44) S.T.R. J151 (S.C.)]

YAGAY andSUN on Feb 22, 2017

However, current provision says Fair Market Value w.e.f 2015.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Feb 24, 2017

I agree with the reply of Sri Kasturi Sir for the reason that the case law mentioned is in support of the provision of section 67 of Finance Act. Though the valuation rules requires the assesse to add free issue of material value, but Act is supreme and prevails over the Act. Hence i am also of the view that the value of free issue material supplied by the recipient of service to the provider of service to incorporate in the construction work shall not form part of consideration to work out service tax payable amount. Thanks.

YAGAY andSUN on Feb 25, 2017

This is still a disputed matter.

Guest on Mar 4, 2017

Dear Sir,

can i take FIM value or not?? for service tax calculation purpose.

Sanjay Vasava

KASTURI SETHI on Mar 4, 2017

Dear Querist,

If FIM is not included in the taxable value, the department will continue issuing demand SCN. The department has not accepted the judgement of the Tribunal. Since the issue is pending with the Supreme Court, the department will keep it pending till the final decision of the Apex Court.

So include FIM in taxable value and pay ST under protest so that you may be able to apply for refund claim later on, if issue is decided in favour of the assessee. By this way you would save interest and penalty.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Mar 5, 2017

Since the matter is pending the issue is open to both. The department interpretes the law in its favour and the assesse to his favour. However if the case is decided in favour of department then interest will have to be paid. Hence as advised by Sri Kasturi Sir you better pay under protest.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues