Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

FIM Value calculating

Guest

Dear Sir,

We awarded a contract to civil party,

We providing Cement, Steel, and Structural steel for construction. can i calculate Structural steel value for service tax calculation (Free issue material).

Currently we are calculating Cement & Steeel value for service tax calculation.

I am confuse, structural steel value calculate or not.

Please advice.

Thanks & Regards,

Sanjay Vasava

Free Structural Steel Not Part of Service Tax Under Section 67, But Pay Under Protest to Avoid Penalties A forum participant inquires about whether the value of structural steel provided for free should be included in service tax calculations. Multiple respondents cite a Supreme Court case and a Tribunal decision, indicating that free materials supplied by the service recipient are not part of the gross amount charged under Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, due to ongoing legal disputes, it is suggested to include the value in the taxable amount and pay under protest to avoid penalties, with the possibility of a refund if the decision favors the assessee. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues