Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Central Excise Registration

Raja krishnan

One body corporate paper manufacturing unit located in one district having Excise RC & running business from 2010 and now they applied new Excise RC by same PAN number for their sister unit located in other district because of crossed 1.50 crore. what is the conditions to be followed by this unit. Department advise this unit because of same PAN you will not avail CENVAT..this is true. please reply...

Corporate Paper Unit Faces CENVAT Credit Issue Over New Excise RC With Same PAN; Clarification Sought on Eligibility A corporate paper manufacturing unit with an existing Central Excise Registration Certificate (RC) applied for a new Excise RC for a sister unit in a different district using the same PAN, due to exceeding a turnover of 1.50 crore. The department advised that using the same PAN would disqualify them from availing CENVAT credit. One respondent questioned the department's reasoning, suggesting input credit should be eligible if it meets the definition. Another agreed with the department, while a third respondent was unclear on the denial of credit due to the same PAN. It was suggested to consult the jurisdictional Range Office for clarification on relevant provisions. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues