Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

classification of sweets/Mithai

ANIL KAGATHARA

1) What is the excise classification of 1) Bengali sweets 2) Kaju sweets 3) Mava sweets ?

2) Is the above products exempted under excise if sale under brand name ?

Excise Duty Exemption Confirmed for Branded Bengali, Kaju, and Mava Sweets; Flour Addition Doesn't Affect Classification A query was raised regarding the excise classification of Bengali, Kaju, and Mava sweets and whether these products are exempt from excise duty if sold under a brand name. The response clarified that these products are exempt from Central Excise duty, referencing a specific circular about exemptions for ready-to-eat packaged food items. Further questions were posed about the impact of adding flour to Bengali sweets, classification changes, and the implications of selling these products in sealed containers. The response indicated that classification changes would not make the products liable to excise, and no immediate case law was available. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues