Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

CHEQUE RETURN PENALTY SERVICE TAX

george thomas

Dear Sir

Our Company is engaged in Trading of Edible oil by appointing CFA OR Trade Associate .After the sales we are receiving Cheque payments .As per the Agreement if cheque is bounced more than 2 times we have the right to collect cheque return penalty charges also along with the invoice amount. Plz clarify whether service tax liability is there for the Cheque Return Penalty charges collected from the party.This charges is a part of the sale invoice amount and not providing any service

Service tax on cheque return penalty: treatment hinges on whether penalty is sale consideration or a taxable service. Whether cheque return penalty charges collected with a sale invoice constitute a taxable service or form part of the sale consideration. The prevailing view is that such penalty charges, when included in the sales invoice for goods, are incidental to the sale and not a taxable service; involvement of a CFA or agent does not convert the penalty into a service. A counterview suggests the transaction could be characterised as a forbearance obligation attracting tax, but others reject that characterisation on these facts. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Ganeshan Kalyani on Feb 11, 2016
Service tax is not applicable on penalty as it does not amounts to service.
KASTURI SETHI on Feb 11, 2016

You have yourself said that penalty charges collected are part of sale invoice.Hence no question of applicability of ST. No service has been provided. Agreed with Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani ji.

YAGAY andSUN on Feb 11, 2016

According to us Section 66 E (e)agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act, or to tolerate an act or a situation, or to do an act; would be applicable on this transaction.

KASTURI SETHI on Feb 12, 2016

M/s. YAGAY AND SUN,

Dear Sirs,

With due respect, I differ with you on this issue. In this case, penalty charges recovered due to bouncing of cheque pertain to sale of edible oil and not to providing taxable service. CFA is not in picture. Had the penalty charges pertained to taxable service, Section 66 (E)(e) would have been applicable.

This is my view and views of other experts are also solicited.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Feb 13, 2016
The subject under issue is very debatable. I remember in recent past issue there had been a strong discussion on the subject. However that issue issue is slightly different from this one. Thanks.
KASTURI SETHI on Feb 14, 2016

Difference of opinion does not mean lack of knowledge. Difference of opinion leads to healthy discussion and thus, in turn, healthy discussion yields more knowledge and clarity on the issue. So every discussion should not remain inconclusive.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues