Sir,
There are judgments/decisions both for and against the eligibility of SSI exemption.
1. In Malawa Ram Handa v. CCE [2001 (136) ELT 629 (CEGAT)] = 2000 (4) TMI 626 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI it was held that putting a tag 'TISCON' (belonging to TISCO) along with details of IS No., Lot No., size and name of TISCO on bundles of bars manufactured for TISCO is 'branding'. the brand need not be on goods.
2. It is held in Khanna Industries v. CCE [1996 (82) ELT 109 (CEGAT)], = 1995 (12) TMI 108 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIFiletech Pharma v. CCE [2000 (120) ELT 372 (CEGAT)], = 2000 (5) TMI 85 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI use of brand name even on packing of goods is sufficient to hold that branded goods are cleared.
Contra decisions; -
1.In CCE v. S.P. Tools [2005 (183) ELT 323 (CEGAT)] = 2005 (1) TMI 182 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI it was held that SSI exemption is available even though assessee was using packing slips with monogram of another person. the mono gram is not embossed on the excisable products.
Therefore the query raised by you is arguable one and only adjudication by quasi judicial authorities alone can decide the issue. You can clear the goods without payment of duty for time being and if any show cause notice is issued then you can contest the same citing the contra decision which is in favour of you.