Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

advice regarding notification

Anil Jangid

WE ARE MANUFACTURING SAUCE UNDER TARIFF NO.210390390 & TAKING ABATEMENT 35% AS PER NOTIFICATION NO.11/2011 & CHARGE EXCISE DUTY 2% AS PER NOTIFICATION NO.1/2011.

BUT WE ARE PUZZLING BECAUSE NOTIFICATION NO.11/2011,ALSO MENTIONED 35% ABATEMENT ON SAUCE. YOU ARE REQUESTED TO GUIDE WHY WE ARE NOT ABLE FOR TAKING BOTH ABATEMENT & CHARGING CONCESSIONAL DUTY 2%.
 

Manufacturing entity can apply both Excise Notifications 11/2011 and 1/2011 for sauce production benefits concurrently. A manufacturing entity is seeking advice on applying two Central Excise notifications related to sauce production. They are confused about using both Notification No. 11/2011, which allows a 35% abatement for valuation purposes, and Notification No. 1/2011, which prescribes a 2% excise duty rate on exempted goods without CENVAT credit. An expert clarifies that both benefits can be availed as they serve different purposes: one for valuation and the other for setting the duty rate. The expert confirms that it is permissible to apply both notifications concurrently. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues