Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Taxability on Ready Mix Concrate

Hiren Patel

In the case of M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd. & Another, ECC Construction Group Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Hydrabad 2015 (10) TMI 612 - Supreme Court, SC has decided that RMC and CM are different product and thus RMC is not covered under notification no 4/1997 so it is liable for tax. So weather RMC made at site for the construction work of Bridge and road is taxable?

Supreme Court Rules Ready Mix Concrete Taxable; Distinguishes from Concrete Mix under Notification No. 4/1997 A query was raised about the taxability of Ready Mix Concrete (RMC) made at a construction site, referencing a Supreme Court decision involving M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd. The court distinguished RMC from Concrete Mix (CM), ruling that RMC is not exempt under Notification No. 4/1997 and is therefore taxable. A reply highlighted that previous tribunal and high court decisions, which equated RMC with CM under Notification No. 41/97, were overturned by the Supreme Court. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration, emphasizing that RMC and CM are distinct products for tax purposes. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
CS RAHUL AGARWAL on Jan 20, 2016

Hi,

Going thru judgement, In simplex Infrastructure case wherein both tribunal as well as P&H HC have held RMC &CM to be same article and covered by the NN. 41/97, the SC have set aside both the order after pronouncing its final observation. The relevant para 21 is reproduced for ready reference:

In this backdrop, the only question is as to whether RMC manufactured and used at site would be covered by notification. Answer has to be in the negative inasmuch as Notification No. 4 dated March 01, 1997 exempts only 'Concrete Mix' and not 'Ready Made Mixed Concrete' and we have already held that RMC is not the same as CM.

So, the apex court have clearly rule out that RMC manufactured at same site and used in same site shall not be covered in NN. 41/97. The simplex case where contrary view was taken has been remanded back to adjudicating authority to be decided in the light of SC pronouncement in instant case. The relevant para 24 read as:

In the instant case, the CESTAT has held that as the RMC was manufactured at site and was used in construction work at site, the same was covered vide Notification No.41/97-CE. This view of the Tribunal has been upheld by the High Court thereby dismissing the appeal of the Revenue. Having regard to our discussion in the case of L&T, this view has to be rejected. we remit the case back to the adjudicating authority to look into the matter afresh from this angle, keeping in view our observations in this judgment.

Hope it is cleared now. RCM & CM are different goods and RMC at site shall not be covered in NN. 41/97 liable to duty even manufactured at site of its use.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues