Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Exemption of ADDL CVD

SANDESH SHINDE

Dear Sir,

Under Customs notification no 21/2012 Sr.no 2 which enables us for exemption of ADDl CVD (4%) on pre-packed commodities with affixed MRP and which are intended for Retial Sale only.

Further if MRP pre-packed goods with affixed MRP on it if supplied for industrial use under EX-bond clearance from Customs, then even after affixing MRP on it whether we can claim exemption of ADDL CVD 4% duty.

Please explain and please give us any reference regarding this.Thanks & Regards.

Exemption of Additional Customs Duty on Pre-Packed Commodities for Retail: Supreme Court Highlights Intent and Circumstances Analysis A query was raised regarding the exemption of additional customs duty (ADDL CVD) on pre-packed commodities intended for retail sale under Customs notification no. 21/2012. The question focused on whether goods with an affixed MRP, supplied for industrial use, qualify for the exemption. A response highlighted the Supreme Court's interpretation of 'intended for' in a related case, emphasizing the need to analyze all circumstances to determine eligibility. Additionally, a case was cited where the intention at the time of clearance was crucial for exemption eligibility, suggesting careful consideration of factual details is necessary. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues