Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?
Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Service Tax collected/deposited without authority of law is 'an amount' and not Service Tax. It is unconstitutional. Hence no time limit. Time limit is for Section 11 B of the Central Excise Act.(Made applicable to service tax. Here it is not applicable. There are so many case laws.You can search on google easily. If not found, let me know.
Sir,
With due respects to the views of Shri. Seth my view is that you have to file an appeal to the appropriate authority and challange the order of A.C of Central Excise that service tax paid is by mistake and hence limitation prescribed under Section 11B if Central Excise Act, 1944 as made applicable to Finance Act, 1994 is not applicable and hence you are eligible for refund since the amount depo0sited is not service tax as per law and it is a mere deposit of amount.
To add on to what Kasturi Sir said, where the amount of tax was not liable to be taxed the time limit made applicable to refund shall not be applicable as it would be deemed to hold as deposit by the department.Ab-initio, the subject sum was in hold as "deposit" by the department. You can get ample of ruling in support of this and department is bound to refund back.
even though they do not replied to SCN so issued, and still demand order is not adjudged, reply to SCN can be made stating any reasonable ground for such delay in response.
Further, appeal can only be filled only when the final demand order is given under seal by A.C/D.C. Moreover, appeal to to such order-in-original can be made before Commissioner(Appeal). So before you are expecting order copy, immediately file reply to SCN
I agree with Sh.CS Rahul Aggarwal and Sh. Rajagopalan Ranganathan. The assesse has to file reply to the SCN. He should apply for extension period for filing reply. Thereafter, SCN will be adjudicated and then appeal can be filed with the Commissioner (Appeals). You cannot file appeal against the SCN direct. In case of non-reply to the SCN, the case will be adjudicated ex parte. Non-filing will weaken your claim of refund.
Thank you so much Kasturi Sir for sharing your highly valuable and enriched knowledge with us. Sir, cant the reply to SCN in such cases, be made belatedly with a strong reasonable ground ? Is it compulsory to apply for extension before filing reply?? What if i file reply with delayed period but before adjudication. I belive that even belatedly, still it is good in law and binding to the adjudicating authority. There is ofcourse time limit for appeal or revision but omission to respond SCN would not invalidate proceeding if a reasonable ground is assigned and thus SCN cant be said to be barred by limitation i think so. We would be fortunate enough if you could please share your expertise.
Others view also solicited.
Dear Shri. Rahul.
Even if the assessee fails to reply to the SCN Department will give him an opportunity to file his reply. Even then if he fails to file his reply the adjudicating authority will fix a date for personal hearing and ask the assessee to file his reply on the date hearing. Even then the assessee did not file his reply and not appeared for personal hearing the adjudicating authority is not barred from passing order on the basis of evidence available on record.
Thank you so much Ranganathan Sir.
Agreed with Sh.Ranganathan and thanks for exact elaboration.
Generally, under the provisions of Natural Justice, Department grants three chances or gives three opportunities to the noticees to appear before the adjudicating authority. If noticees does not appears before the AA then adjudication is done on the basis of merits of the case/matter.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.