Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Whether wrong classification of service category required service tax payment again?

Yatin Bhopi

Dear Experts

EA2000 audit is going on for our Service tax registration. In year 2012 to 2014 we have made service tax payment in consulting engineering service instead of intellectual property service due to wrong classification of service. Now EA 2000 auditors are insisting to pay us service tax again in intellectual property. We argued that since payment has already been made for same service there will be no service tax payment again for same service.

Please let us know any circular for clarification and case laws in our favor

Debate on if wrong service category requires second tax payment; tax already paid under consulting engineering. A discussion on whether a wrong classification of service category necessitates a second service tax payment. An audit revealed payments were made under consulting engineering instead of intellectual property services. Auditors demanded a second payment, but it was argued that since the tax was already paid, it should not be paid again. Experts cited CBEC instructions and case law supporting that service tax should not be paid twice for the same service. It was emphasized that incorrect classification can lead to revenue loss due to potential abatements or reverse charge mechanisms, highlighting the importance of accurate classification. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues