Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

under Section 2(f).

Rajan Rajan

Sir,

Plating/Chromating/amounts to manufacture or not under Section 2(f).

Any process which does not amount to manufacture- List is there if available pls. provide

Debate on Plating and Chromating as Manufacturing under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act; Implications for Duty and Tax. A discussion forum addresses whether plating or chromating processes amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. One participant explains that if these processes fall under the definitions in Section 2(f)(i) or 2(f)(ii), they would be considered manufacturing. Another contributor cites Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff, which lists plating or coating with metals as dutiable, indicating these processes are manufacturing. A third participant references a case law and a notification, supporting that such processes are part of manufacturing and not subject to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues