Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Meaning of 'such as' in construction of rules

Guest

In several provisions phrase 'such as' is used. It's normal meaning is fir example. Is there any legal or supreme court citation.

Clarification on 'Such As' in Legal Texts: Supreme Court Case Highlights Example Use in VAT and Sales Tax Contexts. The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the phrase 'such as' in legal texts, particularly in the context of VAT and sales tax provisions. A query was raised about its meaning and legal citations. It was explained that 'such as' is used to provide examples, not an exhaustive list. A Supreme Court case, Royal Hatcheries (P) Ltd. v. State of A.P., clarified that activities following 'such as' are illustrative. The court emphasized that for an activity to qualify as related to business, it must be similar to listed examples. Consequently, CENVAT credit is not applicable for services by commission agents as they are not analogous to the listed activities. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on Feb 9, 2015

The words 'such as' are used for giving examples for a particular case. This words have been used in the erstwhile definition of 'input service' in Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 which led to many a litigation for the interpretation to term a service as input service.

YAGAY andSUN on Feb 9, 2015

Dear Manoj,

In addition to above reply please go through the appended judgment as required by you.

In Royal Hatcheries (P) Ltd. V. State of A.P., 1994 Supp (1) SSC 429 = 1993 (10) TMI 85 - SUPREME Court , the Supreme Court held that the words "such as" indicate that what are mentioned thereafter are only illustrative and not exhaustive. Thus, the activities that follow the words "such as" are illustrative of the activities relating to business which are included in the definition of input service and are not exhaustive. Therefore, activities relating to business could also be other than the activities mentioned in the sub-rule. However, that does not mean that every activity related to the business of the assessee would fall within the inclusive part of the definition. For an activity related to the business, it has to be an activity which is analogous to the activities mentioned after the words "such as". What follows the word "such as" is "accounting, auditing, financing, recruitment, and quality control, coaching and training, computer networking, credit rating, share registry, and security". Thus, what is required to be examined is as to whether the service rendered by commission agents can be said to be an activity which is analogous to any of the said activities. The activity of commission agent, therefore, should bear some similarity to the illustrative activities. In the opinion of this court, none of the illustrative activities, viz., "accounting, auditing, financing, recruitment and quality control, coaching and training, computer networking, credit rating, share registry, and security" is in any manner similar to the services rendered by Commission agents nor are the same in any manner related to such services. Under the circumstances, though the business activities mentioned in the definition are not exhaustive, the service rendered by the commission agents not being analogous to the activities mentioned in the definition, would not fall within the ambit of the expression "activities relating to business". Consequently, CENVAT credit would not be admissible in respect of the Commission paid to foreign agents.

We hope now the meaning of Such as would be clear to you.

Regards,

Sameer Malhotra - Consultant

YAGAY and SUN (Management, Business and Indirect Tax Consultants)

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues