Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Difference Inclusion of Sales Tax Value Under Transaction value Section 4

Guest

Dear Sir,

In case of Sales Tax deferred payment whether difference of the amount collected and the amount actually paid to the State Government should be included in the transaction value under the Central excise act 1944 and whether central excise duty is payable on the same.If yes please give us any reference regarding this, and under which rule ,Please expalin,thanks and regards

Sales Tax Difference Must Be Included in Transaction Value Under Central Excise Act, 1944, Board Clarifies A query was raised regarding whether the difference between the sales tax amount collected and the amount actually paid to the state government should be included in the transaction value under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and if central excise duty is applicable on this difference. The response confirmed that the Board has clarified this issue, stating that such additional consideration should indeed be included as part of the transaction value. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues