Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

captive consumption

Guest

we manufacture machinery which is used in jute industries.our product is exempted.we consumed some items in a factory as a raw material for making another goods.we have already transferred goods from finished goods to captive consumption and shown in the RG1 register as captive consumption.

Is there is any way to reverse the captive consumption to finished goods???

Machinery Company Seeks Guidance on Reversing Captive Consumption to Finished Goods Under Excise Law, RG-1 Register Update A company manufacturing machinery for the jute industry, exempt from excise, inquired about reversing items used as raw materials from captive consumption back to finished goods. One respondent stated that excise law does not allow reversing captive consumption. Another suggested that reversing is possible if physical stock exists and the entry was a mistake, but requires notifying Central Excise Officials. The discussion highlighted the distinction between written and unwritten laws, with unwritten laws involving interpretations and discussions. The original inquirer confirmed the physical movement of stock and sought guidance on updating the RG-1 register. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues