During the financial year 2010-11, a company (named A) was amalgamated with another company (named B). The amalgamation was in nature of reverse merger i.e. B was merged with A resulting in company named A with pan number of B.
As on 30/09/11, the income tax return of A was filed for 2010-11 with pan no. of B. There was certain tds deductors who deducted and deposited tds (2010-11) in earlier (original) pan no. of A.
In filling income tax return, the entire tds was claimed but intimation issued u/s 143(1) disallowed the same as same not being reflected in form 26AS of A having pan no. of B because the same is reflected in form 26AS of earlier pan no. that A had before merger.
As a result, there is demand from IT department.
Please advise how to tackle this issue.
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI