Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query βœ•
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

CHANGE IN PAN NO.

S.C. WADHWA

During the financial year 2010-11, a company (named A) was amalgamated with another company (named B). The amalgamation was in nature of reverse merger i.e. B was merged with A resulting in company named A with pan number of B.

As on 30/09/11, the income tax return of A was filed for 2010-11 with pan no. of B. There was certain tds deductors who deducted and deposited tds (2010-11) in earlier (original) pan no. of A.

In filling income tax return, the entire tds was claimed but intimation issued u/s 143(1) disallowed the same as same not being reflected in form 26AS of A having pan no. of B because the same is reflected in form 26AS of earlier pan no. that A had before merger.

As a result, there is demand from IT department.

Please advise how to tackle this issue.

PAN change causing TDS mismatch remedied by filing rectification u/s 154 with jurisdictional AO to claim TDS credit. A reverse merger resulted in TDS being reflected under the earlier PAN while the return was filed under the survivor's PAN; the intimation disallowed TDS not appearing in Form 26AS of the current PAN. The advised operative remedy is to file a rectification u/s 154 with the jurisdictional assessing officer to obtain reconciliation and credit for the TDS. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
CAGOPALJI AGRAWAL on Jul 8, 2013

Only remedy is to file rectification application u/s 154 to your Jurisdictional AO.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues