Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

CHANGE IN PAN NO.

S.C. WADHWA

During the financial year 2010-11, a company (named A) was amalgamated with another company (named B). The amalgamation was in nature of reverse merger i.e. B was merged with A resulting in company named A with pan number of B.

As on 30/09/11, the income tax return of A was filed for 2010-11 with pan no. of B. There was certain tds deductors who deducted and deposited tds (2010-11) in earlier (original) pan no. of A.

In filling income tax return, the entire tds was claimed but intimation issued u/s 143(1) disallowed the same as same not being reflected in form 26AS of A having pan no. of B because the same is reflected in form 26AS of earlier pan no. that A had before merger.

As a result, there is demand from IT department.

Please advise how to tackle this issue.

PAN change causing TDS mismatch remedied by filing rectification u/s 154 with jurisdictional AO to claim TDS credit. A reverse merger resulted in TDS being reflected under the earlier PAN while the return was filed under the survivor's PAN; the intimation disallowed TDS not appearing in Form 26AS of the current PAN. The advised operative remedy is to file a rectification u/s 154 with the jurisdictional assessing officer to obtain reconciliation and credit for the TDS. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
CAGOPALJI AGRAWAL on Jul 8, 2013

Only remedy is to file rectification application u/s 154 to your Jurisdictional AO.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues